I totally agree! It’s an insane and insensitive proposal on all counts! You are doing a really job good and we really appreciate the time and energy you are putting into this. Thank you

That’s great news! It’s ridiculous that we have to fight to protect what makes the countryside so special, environmentally dynamic and diverse. I hope they can assist. It would be really useful if a suitable chicken farm site was found elsewhere, without this impact, then there wouldn’t be a problem.

Thank you for letting us know!

It seems strange that Fridays would chose to buy land that is so obviously unsuitable when they were refused for some of the same objections. And is in many ways significant more unsuitable? Do they know something we don’t already?

Would love to hear the feedback from Kent Wildlife Trust about the protection rights of the deer. If that kind of biodiversity isn’t worth protecting, nothing is. It would be a travesty to undermine and take away their natural habitat. A chicken farm next to a river... unbelievable. Friday‘s claim that their farm wouldn’t be adding to river and soil pollution (as per the rebuttal in the Kent News) is bizarre; when you want to put 192,000 chickens on land with a hill that runs towards the river, which regularly floods, pollution is inevitable. The claim that they will not be adding any more pollution than any other farm is also missing the point. It does increase pollution, damage the environment and will impact local wildlife. SOLUTION: NO CHICKENS = NO POLLUTION.